污网站视频在线观看,国产精品激情偷乱一区二区,caoporn超碰随时会被屏蔽,madou精品一区二区

» 諾貝爾經(jīng)濟學獎得主保羅克魯格曼：中國的發(fā)展將是一項了不起的人類成就，它將害死我們所有人Paul Krugman considers China a mortal threat in one key respect: climate change.在氣候變化這個關鍵方面，保羅克魯格曼將中國視為是致命威脅。"If you worry about climate change and stuff like that, then China is -- Chinese growth is a wonderful human success story that could kill us all," the Nobel Prize-winning economist and New York Times columnist said at the New York Times DealBook conference on Wednesday.“如果你擔心氣候變化以及類似的課題，那么中國就是——中國的發(fā)展就是項了不起的人類成就故事，它將害死我們所有人。”這位諾貝爾經(jīng)濟學獎得主兼紐約時報專欄作家在紐約時報周三舉行的DealBook會議上如此表示。He also noted, "To some extent actually, we are hurt by Chinese growth. ... There are scarce natural resources, and we are in fact competing for limited supplies of oil, minerals, etc."他同時提出，“事實上就某些方面而言，我們被中國的發(fā)展所傷害，...自然資源缺乏，我們事實上在爭奪石油跟礦產(chǎn)等資源�！盉ut instead of being confrontational, the U.S. needs to give China more of a voice in trade policy, Krugman said. "You can't deny them a position that corresponds with their size."但與其跟中國進行對抗，克魯格曼認為在貿(mào)易政策上美國反而應該跟中國展開更廣泛的對話。“你沒法拒絕承認中國有權(quán)取得符合自己規(guī)模的經(jīng)濟地位�！盩he alternative, he suggested, is much less appealing. "Even if we conclude that Chinese growth hurts us, what are we going to do? Bomb them?" he asked. "Going out for all-out protectionism is probably not going to be to our benefit."他認為兩個只能活一個的零和游戲不是解決問題之道。“即使我們斷定中國的發(fā)展傷害了我們，我們又能怎么樣？轟炸他們嗎？”他問道，“全面抵制中國的保護主義很可能不符合我們的利益。”China -- which plans to flatten 700 mountains for development, according to China Daily -- is the largest polluter in the world, and most of its electricity comes from coal, the Associated Press reports. But the average American still has a much larger carbon footprint than the average Chinese person, according to a July report by the Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency. A significant percentage of China's greenhouse gas emissions are produced by its export industries.據(jù)中國日報報道，為了發(fā)展，中國計劃推平700座山——美聯(lián)社報道指出，中國是世界上最大的污染源，他的絕大部分電力來自燒煤發(fā)電。不過荷蘭環(huán)境評估研究所6月推出的報告認為美國的人均二氧化碳排放量還是遠遠超過中國人均指數(shù)。中國溫室氣體排放的一個重要部分來自于出口加工業(yè)。Because the country was considered a developing economy when the Kyoto Protocol was written in the 1990s, China is not obligated to cut greenhouse gas emissions under the treaty. The U.S. has not ratified the Kyoto Protocol.在1990年代京都議定書草擬時中國被視為發(fā)展中國家，因此根據(jù)協(xié)定不需要承擔縮減溫室氣體排放的責任。美國尚未批準京都議定書。呵呵 中國也只是“將”印第安人跟黑人是已經(jīng)被你們歐美佬害死多少了？楊大爺這滿滿的優(yōu)越感啊對于玩死他們我已經(jīng)有點迫不及待了叫美國人均少點不就行了說到底還是自恃老大，要別人為他讓步比資源消耗？中國比得上歐美發(fā)達國家？說道浪費，歐美的浪費甩我們幾條街說的好像他們的汽車不燒油一樣的。我們污染嚴重還不是他們要產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移？看見某些人這么不開心，我們就更應該開心了。前主子大英帝國就沒有什么想說的？意思中國不用這些資源他們也不用了 你么這近代污染還少了么諾獎得主：中國的發(fā)展將是一項了不起的人類成就，它將害死我們所有人看見某些人這么不開心，我們就更應該開心了。中國后面還有三哥為了保證我有肉吃 其他人都必須餓死？草泥馬 敢情連大家都少吃點都不行～看他們還能蹦跶多久克魯格曼是一直唱衰中國的，當被中國的發(fā)展打臉后就轉(zhuǎn)向聲稱中國的發(fā)展不可持續(xù)很快就會終結(jié)。