VimIy微民網(wǎng)，讓世界傾聽微民的聲音！
設(shè)為首頁 | 加入收藏 | 網(wǎng)站地圖
前情提要：葉詩文打破400米女子自由泳世界紀(jì)錄時，自然雜志網(wǎng)頁的新聞版面刊登了一篇無論有意還是無意都飽含惡意的新聞，于是被較真的科學(xué)家們圍著抽臉(當(dāng)然，大頭還是我們中國人)，難得的是這些高級噴子講事實擺道理，拿出寫論文的勁頭寫檄文，自然網(wǎng)站的評論服務(wù)器扛不住歇菜了
今天這件事情終于有了結(jié)果，自然雜志的主編專門撰文就這事向讀者解釋，內(nèi)容blabla一大堆，但是結(jié)論很干脆“ We apologize to our readers and to Ye Shiwen.”
不過客觀的說，自然畢竟不是三流小報，講道理的人還是講道理，只要拿出干貨，還是愿賭服輸?shù)拿囱蟠笕硕嫉狼噶�，可惜我估計有些奴才還會嘴硬自然網(wǎng)站的評論服務(wù)器扛不住歇菜了
GFW是保護外國人的系列這個態(tài)度比那個神馬美國游泳教練 還有神馬英國“小報”的態(tài)度好多了騰訊不是出專題說，這樣的質(zhì)疑很“尋常”么。
騰訊多大度多有人文精神啊 這次奧運會其他收獲沒有，倒是看清了白皮豬的嘴臉。這才幾個IP啊，就撐暴了........... Post by 嚴(yán)防死守 (2012-08-07 00:57)
想想前段時間GFW抽風(fēng)，國內(nèi)能訪問G+的時候這么快就認錯了- -
還真是著名雜志，果斷道歉，都不需要打滾嗎。。。不是一堆人去爭取去抗?fàn)幬夜烙嬜匀贿�會接著嘲諷GFW拯救外國人民！ Post by anforceman (2012-08-07 01:00)
之前已經(jīng)打過滾了還刪評論，然后被群噴了 Post by gametopgun (2012-08-07 00:59)
想想都可怕........這算啥啊才……下次來個春運級的！Nature向GFW管理部門提出嚴(yán)正抗議 Post by 芙妮雅西雅 (2012-08-07 01:01)
評論更多的可能是服務(wù)器的問題 [s:37]Nature是不受GFW影響的吧，如果封了nature，國內(nèi)的研究生教授們會發(fā)狂的。圖樣，再不道歉，萬一網(wǎng)絡(luò)水軍跑過去，服務(wù)器要出大事的！
This article has drawn an extraordinary level of outraged response. We much regret this ongoing problem. The disappearance of some cogent responses to the story has fuelled suspicions that Nature is deliberately censoring the strongest criticisms. This is absolutely not the case: Nature welcomes critically minded discussion of our content. (We intentionally removed only a few comments that violated our Community Guidelines by being abusive or defamatory, including several that offensively stereotyped the many Chinese readers who commented on the story.) Many of the commenters have questioned why we changed the original subtitle of the story from “‘Performance profiling’ could help catch sports cheats” to “‘Performance profiling’ could help dispel doubts”. about the improvement in Ye’s time for the 400-metre individual medley: she improved by 7 seconds since July 2011, not July 2012. We have corrected the error. We apologize to our readers for these errors, and for the unintended removal of comments because of technical issues with our commenting system. Below we reproduce one of the most thorough and thoughtful of the hundreds of responses we received. Beneath it, we continue with our response.
The news story was triggered by a debate that was already active, concerning the scale of Ye Shiwen’s victory. Such debates have arisen over many outstanding feats in the past, by athletes from many countries, and it is wrong to suggest, as many of the critics do, that we singled her out because of her nationality. The story’s intention as an Explainer was to examine how science can help resolve debates over extraordinary performances, not to examine those performance statistics in detail. Several analyses done by others convinced us that it was fair to characterize Ye’s performance as ‘a(chǎn)nomalous’ — in the sense that it was statistically unusual. But we acknowledge that the combination of errors discussed above and the absence of a more detailed discussion of the statistics (which with hindsight we regret) gave the impression that we were supporting accusations against her, even though this was emphatically not our intention. For that, we apologize to our readers and to Ye Shiwen.
但是你們要知道，這是國內(nèi)真正頂尖的科學(xué)家們努力反擊取得的成果
忍氣吞聲迎來的只有變本加厲